User name:
Password:

Forgot password? - Sign up

3003e3003e Aje0 Baius BG6UUB CD7RXF dsm girand ja8les jatamo JK1KTU JK1TZG jm1tqh Joe7 jpacura KINGTEST KM6GOX mrmarkham N4NRL pu2scl shooter test

(oh, and don't ask me why there is an extra "h" in the title. Maybe it just wanted to be there.)

Still working at my CW. Today, I worked with a Series of lessons I created in February 2022 but had mostly forgotten. This is a series of Number Lessons like the following, and these were developed using the website:

https://stattrek.com/statistics/random-number-generator

Random Numbers (stattrek.com)

400 Random Numbers
-------------------------------
These are nice if you wish to focus on some numbers only, and they can be pasted into LCWO's
CONVERT TEXT TO CW for a quick lesson.


A
765627623.
902937852.
810838599.
578913659.

B
849799853.
845803784.
608850531.
777648782.

C
691536767.
641564536.
735938886.
730617860.

D
816682786.
810555671.
752791657.
763664594.

E
602844785.
528874761.
640545898.
567842756.

F
904876750.
767924764.
925835747.
890585569.

G
830765694.
718759804.
780813802.
656535737.

H
583625675.
715845633.
922539639.
580651619.

I
572795921.
576636905.
646927692.
926541614.

J
636773789.
608673711.
939799842.
647765825.

K
652800805.
591528779.
877881802.
891831682.


L
816579555.
566687796.
943652622.
526703794.

M
760651944.
886706682.
924836865.
708719658.

N
905901589.
661882692.
881899767.
618754724.

O
935866851.
578621767.
536903757.
542776744.


P
935583739.
706752850.
889912824.
799653770.

Q
932690871.
549823877.
827936703.
777915565.

R
543925727.
896783877.
662548582.
630649823.

S
857867691.
676618753.
655743645.
526602657.

T
891782790.
735537596.
937788718.
851864732.

U
533869828.
896833676.
668721876.
824776548.

V
619616610.
539568692.
727543877 .
613656934 .

W
558815716.
566629828.
534798552.
587648684.

X
743575809.
785928789.
944702735.
668531545.

Y
820829619.
807687650.
862640884.
649905925.

Z
607706602.
628534947.
775935644.
606659549.

With a few broader parameters set in the number list which go from the 70 odd thousands to the 60 million range for the numbers requested, the list obtained is sufficient for some practices too.

Thank you

How do you check for errors?

I trust that you will not lose sleep over this line of inquiry nor be unduly stressed, as I did not have you in mind as the "proper authority" to report to. After all, it is not as though I actually cared what you think about my accuracy, nonagerian, and moreover, if I need your approval, I will seek that only when you have earned my respect, and at the moment, I have no respect for you at all. If you have expectations of "policing" my CW Practices, you are going to be disappointed because I require nothing from you. If you were authorized to "police" my practices, you would have to have been awarded a BUCKY BEAVER BADGE, and thus far, nobody has awarded you a BUCKY BEAVER BADGE.
Had you any awareness at all, you might have realized that most of your communications are based upon errant assumptions, such as:
1 your help is needed
2 your communications are vested in authority
3 BrucerDucer1 is participating here in the expectation of something that you call "advice".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKuvJLTeJYY

(Or, if there are those who prefer a more melodic version of "I Am The Walrus" there is always the
David Lanz performance:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBXynihkhD0

Geez BrucerDucer1, take it down a notch!

If you would stop to consider the possibility that there is no malice behind nonagenarian's post, you might find his question makes sense.

Policing is not the only reason to check for errors. Some people might want to know if they make an error for the sole, legitimate, reason they want to improve their practice.

I don't have access to nonagenarian's thoughts, so your interpretation might well be right, but unless there's clear evidence for the contrary I choose to assume good intent. I certainly don't go off on a rant about the terrible character of another user.

Likewise, I will assume your intentions are to simply take a stand against someone you perceive as a bully, for the sake of improving the social environment in the forum.

I respectfully suggest that this approach of not assuming good intent and instead making raging comparisons of people to semiaquatic rodents and bearded pinnipeds might do more harm than good.

Have a great day!

"Geez BrucerDucer1, take it down a notch!"---sm4ypu - Edvin

"If you would stop to consider the possibility that there is no malice behind nonagenarian's post, you might find his question makes sense."---
sm4ypu - Edvin

Thank you sm4ypu - Edvin for the suggestion for moderation. Based upon your consideration of the 6-word message from "nonagerian" you have errantly supposed that you are fully informed as to the correspondence here.

"I respectfully suggest that this approach of not assuming good intent and instead making raging comparisons of people to semiaquatic rodents and bearded pinnipeds might do more harm than good."----sm4ypu - Edvin

That is of course, speculation and unsubstantiated as to "harm" rather than factually an indication of a "harm". "Harm" is key as a standing point.


I shall not propose that inform yourself better. Notwithstanding, I am well within my rights to propose that all members of the forum show a modicum of respect for the forum administrator and his choice of using a "Peace Symbol" as a header.

It may be a general wisdom to "take it down a notch". Just the same, it would not be logically coherent nor factually relevant to suppose that some excess of emotion or unwarranted hostility is in operation.

Thus my friend, on the basis of the 6 word sentence employed by "nonagerian" you have concluded without rational justification that some excess has been implemented in messaging.

Such a conclusion requires factual supports, and in fact, you are um....policing the forum regarding subjects that you are not at this moment acquainted with.

There's a good fellow.

In summary therefore, I can indicate that I am fully warranted to express my wish that persons hoping to impose themselves upon others are unwelcome as far as the subject matter of CW Practice is concerned. In that regard, I have "harmed" no person.

Just the same, I will consider claims of "harm" if such claims are identified in fact.

The lyrics of "I am the Walrus" by the Beatles make an excellent CW practice. That is worth consideration.

You could also just select figures only on the "change CW settings" screen then run the custom exercises. You get the random numbers and you can check your results.

Don't think so, because he ends up every number with a punctuation dot .

One can generate custom (random) sequences using simple shell functions like this:

https://termbin.com/ztp5

I had to use this trick because the web form will escape all characters.

So if I wanted to generate, say, 200 characters from numbers with some spaces:

$ gen_text1 "1234567890 " 200
46 40696434920794544626296607804244 6836562483316 62739875 761101701492192960 094238117 757995898 686682357516813 7494 77028 09 2690424178643709101 4971010924252990 06515935223730444374517465520 68 0

Generate 200 characters from the first 10 lessons:

$ gen_text1 " K M U R E S N A P T " 200
RANUPPKETEREKSTRNETP URKNP RNPUKNANTSERPNRUSPEAPRATUTKSSEPTENMPPKU SM MR SERUERTAPAPNUPPMPKK R TTTNEKPRMANSETRSUA ESUUPSEUAAAPK UE EUEPU SUR TE TEPMUPAKA TK EUPRTUE UUMMUNMRRATMKPUTENK PMRTASNEKM KNME

All right,

Just recognize that not all people are mentally stable. No harm here with a keyboard, but beware in urban traffic. Let we thank especially ex US military veterans with PTSS who try to compensate it with narcissistic postings right here, explaining that they don't want to learn anything from other people and other methods, and want to find out stubborn everything for themselves, demonstrating for many years that doesn't work, and obviously hoping in contradiction that other people accept their advice.

My plan is just to write "Thank you, very helpful" when such a person publishes 3 feet of random exercises.

More keyboard bravery.

"Just recognize that not all people are mentally stable."---nonagerian

#1 You are not the "administrator" of the website.

#2 You do not have the authority to establish requirements that users "just recognize" anything at all.

#3 Mental Stability is not established as a requirement for registration.

#4 The website LCWO.NET has not published requirements for "recognizing" nor "recognition".

#5 Forum Member "nonagerian" is not recognized as a State Board Certified (nor certified in any context whatsoever) as a certified clinician who is qualifed to diagnoze either mental stability nor mental instability of any member.
From my own vantage point, I occassionaly publish such information as may be relevant to the acquisition of CW skill.

I do wish to make it clear that whatever nonsense you publish on the website is immediately dismissed as either irrelevant for the most part and otherwise disregarded as disrespectful in tone.

As for myself, I take no marching orders whatsoever from you nonagerian.

Alternatively, I do hold other forum members in high regard, and find them to be effective instructors and advisors.
If you have any expectation at all that I am going to request advice or counsel from you, that possibility can be shelved immediately.

Thank you, very helpful