[LCWO LOGO]  

Sisäänkirjautuminen

Käyttäjätunnus:
Salasana:


Language
Bosanski Català
繁體中文 Česky
Deutsch English
Español Suomi
Français Ελληνικά
Hrvatski Magyar
Italiano 日本語
Bahasa Melayu Nederlands
Polski Português
Română Русский
Slovenščina Svenska
ภาษาไทย Türkçe
简体中文

Tällä hetkellä kirjatuneena


LCWO Keskustelufoorumi [Atom LCWO Forum Feed]

Tämä LCWO:n käyttäjien keskustelufoorumi on tarkoitettu kaikelle tähän web-palveluun liittyvälle keskustelulle.

Tredi: plain text training

Takaisin foorumiin

KirjoittajaText
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-20 14:04
Just newbee here,

Was starting exercising plain text american proverbs. (strange people) Tell me your proverbs and I tell you who you are.

But Sent was:
In God we trust, all others pay cash.
received in god we trust, all others pay cash.

Claimed was 1 error. Is that In instead of in or is that God instead of god?
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-20 15:39
16818;

I do not copy plain text only call signs but I think the correct American Proverb is:

"In God we trust, all others must pay cash."

Therefore the one error is leaving out the word "must".

Craig, AH8DX
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-20 17:26
Tks Craig,

But that is not the case here.

I copied and pasted the response of the the program literally. That said what I wrote in my posting, and the only difference are two capitals.

I have an example that he should calculate the omission of must as 4 errors:

sent Chase two rabbits and they'll both get away.
received chase two rabbits and they both get away.

Accuracy: 3 Errors / 41 characters = 93.1%

I would copy your callsign in the reply, and landed in your personal records.
You are doing 62 words per minute I see, Is there anybody that can copy that speed?
I suppose when you are in a contest or such, you play CQ test de AH8DX and that sounds like prrrt prrrt, anybody coming back?
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-20 18:24
I understand your post now and I am sure someone will come forth with the wisdom to help.

When I read your first post, I thought you were joking.

Now, let me answer your question as to me copying 62 wpm and what I do with that in contests. Not really being a cw guy, I am just starting to do cw contests. All of my previous contest experience has been on ssb. While on a recent contest trip to Dutch Sint Maarten operating as PJ7/AH8DX, half way through the contest I was so sick of yelling into the microphone and wasn't having fun; I decided to make a change. That's why you see me here working on my cw.

I generally have been operating cw in a recent contest at 35wpm and in the pile-up most guys were at 27wpm to 35wpm so I was at the upper end.

My second goal is to get good enough to make it to the HST Championships in Poland and eventually my goal is to copy in excess of 100wpm. A short term goal right now is for me to average consistently 50wpm by May 1st.

So as you can see, I must continue to work very hard.

73,

Craig, AH8DX/NU2E
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-20 22:04
Oh boy, that's amazing.
Thanks for your reply at the first place.

CW is about communication.

Long time ago when I got my license I started with telephony, but the neighbors start complaining because hearing me in their domestic appliances.
So I started working telegraphy, I made better dx with a few watts, homebrew tx, did not need to talk other strange languages, and thats it. I never worked something else as CW.

Beautiful in this kind of ham radio is the point point contact without any governmental or third party aid. Everybody can talk nonsense in a microphone, but the distiction of ham radio is the CW. You have to earn the proficiency with willfullnes and persistent exercising. That is a big difference because some guys are engineer and laugh about the theoretical knowledge requirements but EVERYBODY has to make a serious effort to learn CW. Splendid is that when you are not easy in learning you can do that.
I learned that the administrations had abandoned the CW requirement. It is a pity because the requirement to bring a task to an end with repetitive exercising, a selection that the formal ham population on the HF bands met, is gone.

But after I got my license and working CW you got a yl, you get kids you have to pay your mortgage and so: long time no see on the bands.

Now again as a retired MD I am going to start over again doing CW, and YES I am still able to copy 30 wpm callsign, words an sentences after all those years (abt 40).

I applied as member of the group hams coming back after 50 on this website, those guys have a 5 wpm license, and forgot abt that. I still do 30 wpm after all those years.
I just tried the exercises, and YES I can.

Hence preparing my second first qso, hi.
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-21 00:16
Dear Dr.,

You and I have a lot of similarities.

I am 49 years old now and received my first license when I was 15 years old. My elmer which is now an SK, gave me the test back in those days and I passed my Novice and 5wpm. He told me not to take the Technician because then I would be hooked on 2 mtrs and vhf so I took his advice, practiced to get to 13wpm and went and took the test and passed.

My first receiver was a Hamerlund and first transmitter was a Heathkit with just a few crystals and I loved cw but really never got above 20wpm or so. During college, I operated at the University's ham station and received an ARRL Certificate for copying 35wpm and then I met my wife and everything took the back seat to starting a family.

Now that my son and daughter are in high school and soon in college; it's time to get back to cw and have some fun.

Unfortunately this fun is alot of hard work. I don't know why I always seem to pick a past time that involves lots of work, HI.

73,

Craig, AH8DX
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-22 18:14
Here again the program claims one error because I type lower case.
Is that not rediculous? Morse doesn't make a difference between T and t.

Here is the copied text and the sent text according to the program:

sent The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
received the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Accuracy: 1 Errors / 42 characters = 97.5%

New sentence

[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-22 18:25
I can help anybody who is afraid of starting learning morse code but not finishing it. Not finishing is a waste of time. So my help must be highly appreciated.

Pay me 1000 dollar, I pay you back when you finish the course otherwise the money is mine. Deal?
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-22 18:33
Dr.

So by you now copying sentences using the proper capitalization when appropriate, are you now error free with 100 percent.

Past few weeks I have been listening to call sign prefixes at in excess of 500 wpm and have felt my servo mechanism briefly kick in. I took a picture with my camerea of a RufzXP screenshot that I wish I could share with you, simply amazing.

Craig, AH8DX
Administrator


Tallennettu: 2010-04-22 18:42
The one error is not related to upper or lower case letters, but to additional spaces, probably at the end. I'm going to fix it, so trailing spaces will be removed before the text is checked.

73, Fabian DJ1YFK
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-22 20:47
AH8DX
That doesn't hold, because "In God we trust", compared with "in god we trust", was claimed to be one error.
500 wpm?, There is hardly one sinusoid audio in a dot, isn't it?
But when a prefix contains 2 letters and a figure, and not all prefixes are possible, than you can just guess without listening, say AH8, and after on the average 26 times 26 times 10 is 6760 trials you can make your picture at every speed. Right? Take a common prefix such as W1 and you get your result pretty fast.

DJ1YFK
Tks OM, quite clear now, don't bother I now know the reason and can anticipate for it. Tks.
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-22 21:25
Dr.

I'm glad YFK answered your question.

In regards to your response to my copying prefixes at 500wpm.


In your post, you are trying to convince me that it is was a "FLUKE" and that you explain mathamatics to back it up.

Don't do that to me and try to "sabotage" my mind. You will never be able to get to the top of the mountain because
you always have some scientific mathmatical probabilty to back it up.

I am not at home on my computer now but when analyzing what I did, I knew exactly when the powers above kicked in like what happened to me at 60 wpm. If I remember correctly, there were 3 prefixes in a row where I nailed them and all where not US prefixes. I can understand why to because I have only listened to EU prefixes at excess of 500wpm.

I felt for a brief 20 seconds that something special took place. I know the feeling because I have been experiencing it more often lately.

Please do not get in my way...

73,

Craig, AH8DX
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-22 21:35
OK,

Try with the sound switched off, then you can find out how the message enters your subconscious mind, by ears of on an other yet unknown way.
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-22 22:19
Dr.

Sure, I will try. If I copy a full call sign, I will buy you a beer!

I have been experimenting with different tactics lately and still have a headache from the brainwave music I listened to eralier this week.

Thanks,

Craig, AH8DX


Tallennettu: 2010-04-23 12:48
Are we talking 500wpm or cpm? :)
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-23 14:32
:-)

I nailed three EU prefixes in a row when I felt the sm kick on and an uncommon EU 2 x 3 call where I nailed the prefix and the first letter of the call.

Craig, AH8DX


[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-23 14:55
Craig AH8DX didn't answer the question of Test user.

The answer is wpm as he said.
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-23 23:48
:-)

Practice, practice, practice and then a little more practice.
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-24 20:17
What practicing? 193 attemps in RUFZXP and a steady number of 550 callsign exercises on this website does not give the idea of intensive and honest practising. Above that I did not see proof of THREE correct prefixes in a row, when a screenshot of the first call of a RUFZXP session is presented.

Hence my simple calculation holds.

Is there any doping check out on the HST championchips, just as in any other championship?

If not even I, with my 31 wpm top score, can easily win, because I have the know how, and the drugs required available, due to my profession. I will not but I can for sure.

Why should you not just take the drugs that your body learns to make itself bij exercising like mad for at least one year and wasting your valuable time when you can just add the required amount of drugs in your system at the moment supreme?

Not healthy, ok your statement but, exercising for a long period and hence making yourself the same chemicals in your system in a slowly increasing amount for a long term must than be less healthy.


Tallennettu: 2010-04-26 17:28
Doctor Faust.....I'm glad you're not my doctor. I could only hope to get to the level that this kid has achieved so far some day. I see him on hear every day practicing and I have been keeping an eye on him working his self up the RufzXP list. The number of RufzXP attempts is well in line with what he is doing here and one cannot get better if they don't work hard at it. Secondly, you say that you have access to drugs that can make you copy at high speeds??? Then why are you still at 31 wpm??? Why not take one of those little pink and yellow pills to get you to 32 wpm? From what I have read of your posts, you are one crazy doctor.
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-26 23:36
That is a good question, Why am I on 31 wpm. I think because I was for a very long time not active on the ham bands, and so I think it is not a bad speed to communicate with.

Furthermore I think it is a senseless waste of time to exercise like mad, to make speeds that nobody can communicate with specialised on call signs.

I tell you this, I just prove my statement that a drug enforcement on championships for high speed CW is necessary. I prove it by solving 32 microgram lysergic acid diethylamide in a half pint of water and drinking that. It is just made of natural components C H N and O. Just healthy bricks nature is build of. You find them in fresh air, water and healthy salad leaves.

After 22 minutes I notices that my watch was going in reverse, just counting backwards, and that was the moment I started my second attemt call sign copy (the first one was on 31 recorded)
I just didnot listen to the calls, I just knew them, according to my feeling earlier then they were transmitted.

Look at numer 12 in the topscores. I started at 50 wpm, and did not have any callsign in error.
So this will proof my statement.

Mu watch is again starting to fhjm so just 37


Tallennettu: 2010-04-27 03:18
Do you think we are all fools?
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-27 11:38
Oh no, please Mr Test, don't ask me a question that I can't answer honestly without being unpolite and crude.

Perhaps you did not verify the results of my experiment, because I stated erroniously #12. At this moment you have to select "high scores" in the topline of the LCWO screen, and then scroll to the header "call sign training", my result of the experiment yesterday you will find under number 15. Hence not 12 as I menstioned 2 postings higher. Sorry.
[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-28 22:03
Convinced, Mr Test?


Tallennettu: 2010-04-29 00:40
Nope. I am now convinced that you are a "MORON". Take your code deciphering device over to Rufz and report back here if it works, GL. I see the advice you are giving members of the groups you belong to. Telling guys to just learn their own call and through it into pile-ups to try to work DX. Program their own call in F1 and the exchange in F2??? Why don't you learn code the proper way instead of figuring out work-arounds. I'm sticking with my statement above, do you think we are all fools?

[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-04-29 01:39
Sri Mr Test.

I don't have a code deciphering device available. Never used such a program or device either.

Just taking morse on ear. No problem 80% >100 attempts 31 wpm, check my records in plain text copy.

You did not recognise ironic in my refered thread ig the 50 group? Please read:
http://www.morsecode.nl/KH2DContesting.PDF

I persist in my point
that
with properly chosen mental stimulates under control of a professional, it is easy to perform a factor better for a short time than the usual proficiency.
Hence my conclusion keeps standing that drug enforcement control on championships turns out to be necessary, in order to be sure of honest ranking.

Why are you trying to insult me?
I am polite against you and will certainly not follow you on this way.

I read in wikipedia:
Moron (psychology), disused term for a person with a mental age between 7 and 12, and a common insult for a person considered stupid.

Don't you think Tom that it is better to conversate with each other in a respectful and honest way instead of trying to insult your opponent, due to an obvious lack of arguments?


Tallennettu: 2010-05-01 03:21
Just as I thought Dr. Faust, your code deciphering device did not work when you tried to use it to make a Rufz attempt. I am still convinced though that you are one crazy doctor from drinking your own concoctions.

I am watching you!

[deleted]

Tallennettu: 2010-05-01 12:23
I just did my daily exercise american proverbs, and it said:
Character is what you are in the dark.


Tallennettu: 2010-05-01 13:07
I am sorry 16818,

I am not yet drunk right now. I apologise for my behavior. Please don't read other postings that I place here, when I have seen the bottom of the bottle.

Takaisin foorumiin

Sinun täytyy kirjautua sisään voidaksesi käyttää foorumia.

$Id: forum.php 147 2012-01-12 18:04:05Z dj1yfk $